Cheap
Meat:
An Accident Waiting to Happen
By Jo Robinson
Printer
Friendly Version
The latest fiasco in the U.S. livestock industry
is that thousands of hogs and chickens have been raised on feed contaminated
with melamine, the same chemical that has sickened thousands of cats
and dogs. According to the U.S.D.A., some meat from those hogs and chickens
has already entered our food supply.
How did this happen? The story begins
in China. Melamine is an inexpensive by-product of the coal industry.
In a deceptive practice, some Chinese producers have been adding melamine
to rice, wheat, and soy meal to make the products appear to contain more
protein. (Melamine is not a protein and has no food value, but it is
rich in nitrogen and mimics protein on standardized laboratory tests.)
Melamine costs less than true sources of protein, so the manufacturer
makes more money.
The story continues in the United States. In order
to lower the cost of pet food production, U.S. companies have been importing
cheap protein meal from China. The pet food manufacturers had no way
of knowing that some of these products were spiked with melamine. The
exact number of dead and sickened pets is unknown.
But how did melamine
get fed to our pigs and chickens? A common cost-cutting practice in the
livestock industry is to supplement animal feed with floor sweepings
and other leftovers from pet food manufacturing plants. In recent months,
however, some of the sweepings happened to be laced with melamine. In
this serpentine fashion, a cost-cutting adulterant that was added to
protein meal in China found its way into U.S. pet food, then U.S. livestock
feed, and then the food on our dinner tables.
The F.D.A. and the U.S.D.A.
do not foresee any health consequences from eating melamine-spiced pork
and poultry. This may prove to be true. The family pets that died ate
the melamine itself; we are eating chickens and pigs that ate the melamine,
diluting its concentration.
We may have dodged the bullet this time,
but as long as we continue to raise our livestock on a least-cost basis,
our health is at risk. For example, many cost-cutting practices lower
the nutritional value of our meat. Research shows that the nearly universal
practice of fattening cattle on straw and grain instead of fresh pasture
gives us beef that is higher in total fat and lower in antioxidants and
omega-3 fatty acids. The practice causes no immediate harm, but our health
may suffer over the long term.
Some cost-cutting strategies are deadly.
In the 1980s and 90s, feedlot managers tried to save money by feeding
cattle scraps back to cattle. The tragic result was mad cow disease.
Eating meat contaminated with trace amounts of melamine may cause little
or no harm. Eating just one serving of beef from a mad cow can kill you.
Adding more governmental oversight is a stop-gap
solution. We need a sea change in the way we raise our livestock. We
need to raise the animals on their native diets or on quality ingredients
that match their original diets as closely as possible. When we feed
wholesome feed to our animals, we can serve wholesome food to our families.
We are what our animals eat.
**************
Note: If you would like to
use this essay in your publication, you do not need to ask for permission.
However, please print the article exactly as written and append the following
information:
Jo Robinson is the originator and primary researcher
of www.eatwild.com, a science-based website that details the benefits
of raising animals on pasture. She is also the author of Pasture Perfect,
the Far-Reaching Benefits of Choosing Meat, Eggs, and Dairy Products
from Grass-fed Animals.

|